Get access to everything we publish when you The firmness of the DNA Loft v3 midsole communicates that it intends to provide a supportive platform, albeit with more bounce than a traditional daily trainer. Immediately my mind went Yeah, this is great, but what would a Glycerin run like with *this* midsole material, and ever since its been the waiting game. The step in feel, always a Brooks strength is sublime from underfoot to upper feel. Of course the outsole plays a key role in holding it all together. 
The Stealthfit upper in my version of the Glycerin 20 reminded me of some of Nikes Flyknit uppers. All in all, its the perfect upper for this shoe.
The dark blue accents and laces dont help much. I know the 15 has just come out, but Im still on the 14. Buy both, alternate them every other day, and thank me later. Im curious as to whether the Stealthfit adds to the general blah of the Glycerin for me, but it may be that its just not a shoe that works for me. Unlike the decoupled midsole of the futuristic looking Aurora BL, the Glycerin has a single block of foam that has a (for lack of a better way to describe it) soft firmness to the touch. Ill say that the knit upper seems pretty outdated. This is not a speedwork or tempo shoe, but for those days in between when your legs are tired and you just want a shoe that feels good as you shuffle through some recovery miles, you could do far worse than the Glycerin. Here is how those versions compare to one another. As an easy run or recovery shoe, it ticks all the boxes for me. Ive had a few runs in them and am still waiting for them to open up. glycerin The Glycerin 20 is everything the Invincible was supposed to be, but isnt. The Glycerin 20 is soft but has enough flex and bounce to keep you rolling forward all day long. Lets dive in and see where the Glycerin shines and where it doesnt. The most notable differences between this generation and the 19 are the increased stack height of the 20, with its spunkier DNA Loft compound, and the smoother and much improved transition of the 20. New York, The GTS (Go-To-Support) Guide Rails are a foam rail of the same foam as the midsole on the lateral side (shown above) and a medial rail of a co molded (no glue layer) slightly firmer foam (shown below). Everything seems set for a great review. That said, Brooks has made the midsole and outsole of the shoe slightly wider in the Glycerin 20 to allow for a smoother transition and toe-off on the run. The Glycerin fits true to size for me, with ample space in the forefoot and a secure midfoot. 
The ride in the 1080 improved and feels more stable and works together better with its he rocker from heel to toe. The first thing I noticed when I started running this shoe was I felt it would be fun and fun it is. Enjoyed this post? Its that good. Its not either of those shoes, but takes elements of both very cleanly. The eyestay is made of a cord thats stitched into the upper. With the Glycerin 20, Brooks has tweaked the midsole, which now features the brands nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 foam. 
brooks glycerin pv20 blu herrenschuhe laufschuhe amortiguacin 365rider gedmpfte 
Its upper (Stealthfit in my case) secures your foot well over the big slab of DNA Loft v3 and makes for a great easy run and recovery shoe. Peter: The 880 is almost a full ounce heavier than the Glycerin Stealthfit, but feels lighter, smoother, more forgiving and more enjoyable every step.
No contest. I think that a mesh upper might do a better job of locking the foot down to the midsole. RTR German, Spanish, French, Danish, Polish Reviews, Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 Multi Tester Review: Speed Meets New Comfort & Versatility! Im going to have to try another couple of runs in these apparently. If your wallet can take the hit and you want the best 1-2 punch of big cushion trainers ever put together? Get ahead of the pack with new shoe alerts, special savings, and more. Widths: 3 medium, wide, narrow. We had to have the 19 to get to 20, but the 20 feels like it could be five generations later than the 19, its that big of a step forward. Its more lightweight and breathable (the Glycerin 20 is lighter than previous versions, which weighed in at a half-ounce more), without feeling too sock-like. RELATED: The Best Womens Racing Shoes Available This Year. Ive put a lot of miles on last years Glycerin 19, and spent a fair amount of time in them casually after retiring them from running service, so Im very familiar with how the modern Glycerin looks and feels - and the Aurora BL (Brooks first shoe with DNA Loft v3) was my road shoe of the year last year, so I thought I knew what to expect. Jeff: My Regular/Regular (standard upper, non-GTS version) showed up in the local Denver Broncos blue and orange colorway, and looked a little understated right out of the box. The Stealthfit upper versions likely would be more supportive and in a twist the similar stack height trail Caldera 6 (RTR Review) also with DNA Loft v3, high stable side walls all around and a very supportive gusseted upper. The Glycerin is the luxury max cushion shoe in Brooks lineup. The extra material works well to significantly dampen road impact, and I wont be surprised if this midsole ends up lasting for well over 300 miles. I think the Invincibles super bouncy nature is more fun, but more fun doesn't make it a better shoe. Both are incredible, if you want a little softer ride? The only similarity between the 2 shoes is their stack height. Everything seems set for a great review. Nike Zoomx Invincible Run Flyknit (RTR Review). In my opinion, this is one of the best versions of the Brooks Glycerin yet. glycerin While there is a noticeable amount of bounciness from the DNA Loft, its firm enough that it doesnt necessarily feel deep. Thanks. My vote goes to the Glycerin.
In general, the running experience was a soft, ride with some springy responsiveness to add to some pep when the legs begin to tire. Literally a foam/midsole/outsole to run forever and a day on: energetic, deep, stable, pleasing, smooth rolling, lighter than weight: Sam/Beto/Jeff/Ryan, Very smooth nitrogen-infused midsole Joost/Beto/Jeff/Ryan/Sam, Soft, stable ride - Alex/Beto/Sam/Jeff/Ryan, Pleasant fit (Stealthfit upper) Joost/Beto/Peter, Stealthfit weight just under 10 oz / 283g for my M9.5 Joost, Could wear these shoes all day - Alex/Jeff/Peter, Stealthfit is an easy on and off shoe and still very secure lockdown. Stop me if youre heard this before, because it lines up very cleanly to the Glycerin 20- part of the reason I made the video below profiling and comparing the two shoes. Not a huge surprise, the result is pretty great, but it is surprisingly different from the Aurora BL. The previous version had an EVA-foam midsole.
I concur with the other reviewers in that these deliver a pleasant, seamless ride. Ride: 9.8 (50%) Fit: 9.5(30%) Value: 9.0 (15%) Style: 10 (5%). Ive been happy to see knit shoes receding from the marketand this looks very 2019 to me. Compared to the likes of the Nike Invincible Run, it doesnt feel too cloud-like when youre walking in it, although this isnt necessarily a bad thing its still cushioned and has a good amount of responsiveness.
Comparable in target audience and runs. The Blue Line department is where the companys cutting edge technology is developed. The Glycerin 20 Stealthfit feels good on the foot. Both have light plush regular mesh uppers with inadequate support. Would the Glycerin 20 be the answer to all my problems? Overall, this is a fine and very comfortable upper, which secures the foot nicely in place.
Women's BROOKS GLYCERIN STEALTHFIT 20 :: Sneak up on your competition wearing your updated Women's Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 20 running shoes. Traction is ok and durability should be in line with other Brooks shoes. Even though they run an ounce lighter than their weight on paper, theres definitely some added inertia to this design. (Ride 8.9 - 50%, Fit 9.5 - 30%, Value 8.5 - 15%, Style 8 - 5%). The Glycerin 20 is much easier to live with and run in on a daily basis. But the midsole has sort of a beveled edge and a plastic-y look that makes it look more orthopedic than my personal preference. I missed a few in the early teens, but otherwise Ive logged some solid miles in most models and the Glycerin 16 was my first review for RTR - so every year a new Glycerin lands it feels like my anniversary reviewing shoes. Both are incredible, if you want a little softer ride? The upper holds my foot in place and is very comfortable too. - Beto, DNA Loft V3 midsole, flexibility, and stability make easy runs fun-Sam, GTS support Guide Rails not noticed and likely useful for neutral runners given the soft foam and fairly loose comfort fit regular upper version I have: Sam, DNA Loft v3 bounce is more subtle than the Aurora B;sL- Jeff/Sam, Weight is way up there 10.9 oz US9 in my GTS with regular upper especially given DNA Loft v3 supercritical foam and how light the similar Aurora-BL was. Its looks are polarizing, its upper unconventional, and its bounce undeniable, the Aurora-BL was one of the most unique shoes to come out in some time, and I was and am a big fan of it. My Regular/Regular (standard upper, non-GTS version) showed up in the local Denver Broncos blue and orange colorway, and looked a little understated right out of the box. 7 Comparisons, Brooks Glycerin 20 Multi Tester Reviews: 4 versions with energetic DNA Loft v3 supercritical foam. Every part of the upper strives to provide comfort mile after mile, with a layered mesh surrounding most of the foot. Create a personalized feed and bookmark your favorites. At every point it is a few millimeters wider, but its one of those things where the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts - a few millimeters here and there really adds up. SATISFY Running Apparel Reviews and Interview: Tru adidas Terrex Agravic Pro Review: more carbon plat ON Running Cloudrunner Multi Tester Review. While underfoot is stable up top most support/stability shoes have at least some additional medial upper support via overlays, straps, or denser mesh. Join Outside+ to get Womens Running magazine, access to exclusive content, thousands of training plans, and more. I ran the Glycerin 17 and was surprised at just how much I enjoyed them. I remember loving the Glycerins because they were soft but didnt feel slow, and they flexed in a way that made them feel responsive. The best-looking shoes arent the ones you want on your feet at mile 21 of a marathon the most comfortable ones are. The DNA Loft V3 midsole has just the perfect amount of soft but not a sink in feel. Where Skechers has failed me time after time is in the upper department of their performance oriented shoes. The Glycerin has the great advantages of a modern supercritical foam, being soft while not bottoming out, not too heavy and also quite responsive. At first, this was not my impression. -, Stealthfit fits like a glove and the lockdown is just perfect and secure. There is an absolutely massive helping of the stuff here, making this an ideal high-mileage workhorse that excels at beating back even some of the roughest, toughest asphalt. In the support version, the shoe comes in three different colorways for both men and women. There are a few stand-out changes to this new edition that are greatly appreciated. My regular upper over built and over plush? Plated loud racers are a different animal and purpose and are often noisy. This may very well be an excellent high-mileage trainer for runners that have more upper body muscle than I do, though! What no gusset in such an upper in general and especially in a support oriented shoe? In my opinion, the best Glycerin yet. As Jeff said the shoe uses the same Fresh Foam X its shape changed with the forefoot a bit wider and now I feel less road at each step. Its not either of those shoes, but takes elements of both very cleanly. Ill report back after a couple of more runs if anything changes. My first run was for an easy run and the shoe felt a bit firm but at the end of the run the shoe felt more energetic and the next run the shoe felt amazing, soft and responsive and very well balanced. On a progression run I started slow and felt the soft and bouncy ride but as the pace started to pick up the shoe feels more energetic which make a fun ride and the only other shoe I enjoyed that feeling was the Triumph 19 well balanced and soft and bouncy with that energy return to cruise the miles. Theres not a great amount of grip, but I had no issue during testing, even when running on wet sidewalks. Its a perfect marathon training shoe if youre looking to only buy one running shoe, and its durable enough to get you through most of your training. I still dont think the Glycerin 20 is a huge smile shoe, but I think its a little smile shoe, maybe a big smirk, but its a big smirk you can put virtually all of your easy miles on and not have to worry about the extra wear and tear all the big bounces are putting on your lower legs. Im not a huge fan of knit uppers, and I think that even though this upper feels good on the foot and holds decently, it still contributes to the lack of harmony of the shoe. Then technology such as here DNA Loft v3 is adopted in the traditional lines like the Ghost, Caldera 6 trail (. As Joost, Alex and Jeff said and they are right. If your wallet can take the hit and you want the best 1-2 punch of big cushion trainers ever put together? For me it is hard to choose between these two but the Glycerin 20 caught me by surprise with this new version of the DNA Loft v3 and is definitely a shoe worth the money, and is durable and fun as is the Triumph 19. Did anyone who tested the GTS version also have experience with the Kayano 28s? The Glycerin is the more usable shoe, that gives a little bit of bounce, and none of the achilles pain. Given the flatness of the underfoot geometry, theres a relatively high amount of outsole material in contact with the ground at any given time, further enhancing traction and improving the ride. It is a modern do it all daily trainer whereas the Glycerin is a plush cruiser for slower miles. I found older versions indeed plush all around and quite ponderously soft and dull. Powered by, The Glycerin 20 and in my version the GTS version with the regular upper had me paying attention for one key reason. Literally a foam/midsole/outsole to run forever and a day on: energetic, deep, stable, pleasing, smooth rolling, lighter than weight: Stealthfit weight just under 10 oz / 283g for my M9.5, Stealthfit is an easy on and off shoe and still very secure lockdown. The ride is not fast, that's for sure given the weight and broad platform. I sure was happy that I had the GTS version to stabilize things and for sure regretted even with GTS not receiving true to size as the loose fit impacted the performance. I found it had plenty of volume, the laces were secure, and the heel collar is not too bulky. Ive been putting most of my miles on this shoe to test durability, because the exposed lateral edge is normally where I land, and in Glycerins past that DNA Loft v1 would get torn up pretty quickly. No reak medial reinforcements higher up to go with the effective and even for me as a neutral runner kind of essential here Guide Rails to help support the foot at the critical lace up and rear collar area? The Glycerin ticks the typical knit upper boxes like a denser knit in areas that need to secure the foot, or give support and a more open knit over the forefoot, in order to provide some breathability. Putting them on I started to warm up a bit to the Glycerin 20. I checked reviews of past versions and Brooks own information of this new version to see what I might have been missing all these years. Nothing here.
The step in feel, always a Brooks strength is sublime from underfoot to upper feel. Check out our guide to buying running shoes here). The midfoot feels very secure and the heel counter has no issues and no slippage. Someone who is looking for a reliable training shoe that is affordable, durable, and offers cushion and stability. Thank you, 2017 Road Trail Run. While it stuck with the same Fresh Foam X theyve been using for a few years, the shape and volume of the midsole changed, and with it, the entire ride improved by leaps and bounds. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Ive had a few runs in them and am still waiting for them to open up. There are now four, yes four, versions in the Glycerin family to choose from, depending upon your pronation needs, fit preferences, and weight preferences. I ran 85 miles in this shoe and the outsole is holding pretty well even at my normal wear areas. Theres going to be plenty of detail below, but if you need to know the story has a happy ending before you start, rest easy. I got this years Guide instead of the Ride for review, and while Ive only had a couple of shorter runs in it, I can confirm that the light control elements of the Guide dont really sit well with my stride. The Brooks logo overlays on either side of the Glycerin provide a tiny extra bit of structure to the midfoot. Dont get me wrong its a good shoe, and Im going to keep it in my rotation for those long run miles, but the Glycerin 20 definitely lets you know its meant for the easy days. It is very obviously a different compound than past versions of DNA Loft. - Beto, Stealthfit fits like a glove and the lockdown is just perfect and secure. Theres a big slab of foam here and on first touch it seems less flexible than previous Glycerin models. Sam, Stealthfit upper a bit warm for warm climates (Africa and Mexico) Joost/Beto, In spite of the nice transitions, a bit of a dull ride Joost/Peter, Took me a couple runs to get the midsole to feel smooth (though now that it is, its great) Alex/Sam, Plush upper provides slightly too loose of a fit Ryan/Sam, Over-engineered midsole for lighter runners Ryan, Makes me want to take up a different sport Peter, mens GTS regular upper 10.9 oz / 309g (US9), non-GTS Stealthfit (US9.5) 282g / 9.95 oz. I dont find it to be flexible, bouncy or smooth. Detractions for a loose fit from an overly plush upper, above average weight, and an over-engineered midsole for lighter runners. Its comfortable, but ultimately doesnt help the overall feel of the shoe for me. It is well matched to the midsole and stabilizes the soft DNA Loft v3, has effective deep decoupling groove to help get past that flat on the ground midfoot area and iis very quiet on the road, always a sign of well matched materials and effective geometry in a trainer. Fit is spot on true-to-size for length, although the Regular/Regular is a very high volume shoe. PWRRUN+ is a nice midsole that also last a lot of miles and the outsole has great traction dry or wet with lots of rubber for durability. ASICS Metaspeed Sky+ and Edge+ Marathon Super Shoe Garmin inReach Mini 2 Review: 2 Way Satellite Mess Skechers Performance GO Run Razor Excess 2 Multi T Testbericht: Saucony Peregrine 12 - leichter und k Quick Strides 33: Derek Lis Zurich Marathon Repor Avis et Impressions: Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite-Objet New Balance Fresh Foam X Tempo v 2 Review. The smooth, bright white midsole looks massive out of the box.
RELATED: The Best Running Shoes for Women with Flat Feet.
The luxurious feel and the soft ride also make it a great option for those long slow distance runs. glycerin While I appreciate the drama-free and very comfortable plush feeling it delivers, at times it felt a bit loose, especially in the toe box. Ive found the past few iterations of the Glycerin a little meh, but all this has changed with the Glycerin 20. Glycerin. For the regular version, the upper has been tweaked slightly from previous iterations. 
adrenaline shoegalleryonline While a bit heavier yet, and with a trail outsole, if you need a long slow road and recovery days trainer that of course can trail also please consider it. I sure was happy that I had the GTS version to stabilize things and for sure regretted even with GTS not receiving true to size as the loose fit impacted the performance. Lets see what this all means on the run. With the midsole bulging out around the edges of the outer, Ive noticed a bit of wear on the lateral edges of the DNA Loft already, but there seems to be enough outsole material to prevent this from becoming a real problem. Traction has held up fine, and it seems like it should be durable, though its too soon to tell. 10 Comparisons. While underfoot is stable up top most support/stability shoes have at least some additional medial upper support via overlays, straps, or denser mesh.
The Stealthfit upper in my version of the Glycerin 20 reminded me of some of Nikes Flyknit uppers. All in all, its the perfect upper for this shoe.
The dark blue accents and laces dont help much. I know the 15 has just come out, but Im still on the 14. Buy both, alternate them every other day, and thank me later. Im curious as to whether the Stealthfit adds to the general blah of the Glycerin for me, but it may be that its just not a shoe that works for me. Unlike the decoupled midsole of the futuristic looking Aurora BL, the Glycerin has a single block of foam that has a (for lack of a better way to describe it) soft firmness to the touch. Ill say that the knit upper seems pretty outdated. This is not a speedwork or tempo shoe, but for those days in between when your legs are tired and you just want a shoe that feels good as you shuffle through some recovery miles, you could do far worse than the Glycerin. Here is how those versions compare to one another. As an easy run or recovery shoe, it ticks all the boxes for me. Ive had a few runs in them and am still waiting for them to open up. glycerin The Glycerin 20 is everything the Invincible was supposed to be, but isnt. The Glycerin 20 is soft but has enough flex and bounce to keep you rolling forward all day long. Lets dive in and see where the Glycerin shines and where it doesnt. The most notable differences between this generation and the 19 are the increased stack height of the 20, with its spunkier DNA Loft compound, and the smoother and much improved transition of the 20. New York, The GTS (Go-To-Support) Guide Rails are a foam rail of the same foam as the midsole on the lateral side (shown above) and a medial rail of a co molded (no glue layer) slightly firmer foam (shown below). Everything seems set for a great review. That said, Brooks has made the midsole and outsole of the shoe slightly wider in the Glycerin 20 to allow for a smoother transition and toe-off on the run. The Glycerin fits true to size for me, with ample space in the forefoot and a secure midfoot. 
The ride in the 1080 improved and feels more stable and works together better with its he rocker from heel to toe. The first thing I noticed when I started running this shoe was I felt it would be fun and fun it is. Enjoyed this post? Its that good. Its not either of those shoes, but takes elements of both very cleanly. The eyestay is made of a cord thats stitched into the upper. With the Glycerin 20, Brooks has tweaked the midsole, which now features the brands nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 foam. brooks glycerin pv20 blu herrenschuhe laufschuhe amortiguacin 365rider gedmpfte Its upper (Stealthfit in my case) secures your foot well over the big slab of DNA Loft v3 and makes for a great easy run and recovery shoe. Peter: The 880 is almost a full ounce heavier than the Glycerin Stealthfit, but feels lighter, smoother, more forgiving and more enjoyable every step. No contest. I think that a mesh upper might do a better job of locking the foot down to the midsole. RTR German, Spanish, French, Danish, Polish Reviews, Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 Multi Tester Review: Speed Meets New Comfort & Versatility! Im going to have to try another couple of runs in these apparently. If your wallet can take the hit and you want the best 1-2 punch of big cushion trainers ever put together? Get ahead of the pack with new shoe alerts, special savings, and more. Widths: 3 medium, wide, narrow. We had to have the 19 to get to 20, but the 20 feels like it could be five generations later than the 19, its that big of a step forward. Its more lightweight and breathable (the Glycerin 20 is lighter than previous versions, which weighed in at a half-ounce more), without feeling too sock-like. RELATED: The Best Womens Racing Shoes Available This Year. Ive put a lot of miles on last years Glycerin 19, and spent a fair amount of time in them casually after retiring them from running service, so Im very familiar with how the modern Glycerin looks and feels - and the Aurora BL (Brooks first shoe with DNA Loft v3) was my road shoe of the year last year, so I thought I knew what to expect. Jeff: My Regular/Regular (standard upper, non-GTS version) showed up in the local Denver Broncos blue and orange colorway, and looked a little understated right out of the box. The Stealthfit upper versions likely would be more supportive and in a twist the similar stack height trail Caldera 6 (RTR Review) also with DNA Loft v3, high stable side walls all around and a very supportive gusseted upper. The Glycerin is the luxury max cushion shoe in Brooks lineup. The extra material works well to significantly dampen road impact, and I wont be surprised if this midsole ends up lasting for well over 300 miles. I think the Invincibles super bouncy nature is more fun, but more fun doesn't make it a better shoe. Both are incredible, if you want a little softer ride? The only similarity between the 2 shoes is their stack height. Everything seems set for a great review. Nike Zoomx Invincible Run Flyknit (RTR Review). In my opinion, this is one of the best versions of the Brooks Glycerin yet. glycerin While there is a noticeable amount of bounciness from the DNA Loft, its firm enough that it doesnt necessarily feel deep. Thanks. My vote goes to the Glycerin.
In general, the running experience was a soft, ride with some springy responsiveness to add to some pep when the legs begin to tire. Literally a foam/midsole/outsole to run forever and a day on: energetic, deep, stable, pleasing, smooth rolling, lighter than weight: Sam/Beto/Jeff/Ryan, Very smooth nitrogen-infused midsole Joost/Beto/Jeff/Ryan/Sam, Soft, stable ride - Alex/Beto/Sam/Jeff/Ryan, Pleasant fit (Stealthfit upper) Joost/Beto/Peter, Stealthfit weight just under 10 oz / 283g for my M9.5 Joost, Could wear these shoes all day - Alex/Jeff/Peter, Stealthfit is an easy on and off shoe and still very secure lockdown. Stop me if youre heard this before, because it lines up very cleanly to the Glycerin 20- part of the reason I made the video below profiling and comparing the two shoes. Not a huge surprise, the result is pretty great, but it is surprisingly different from the Aurora BL. The previous version had an EVA-foam midsole. I concur with the other reviewers in that these deliver a pleasant, seamless ride. Ride: 9.8 (50%) Fit: 9.5(30%) Value: 9.0 (15%) Style: 10 (5%). Ive been happy to see knit shoes receding from the marketand this looks very 2019 to me. Compared to the likes of the Nike Invincible Run, it doesnt feel too cloud-like when youre walking in it, although this isnt necessarily a bad thing its still cushioned and has a good amount of responsiveness.
Comparable in target audience and runs. The Blue Line department is where the companys cutting edge technology is developed. The Glycerin 20 Stealthfit feels good on the foot. Both have light plush regular mesh uppers with inadequate support. Would the Glycerin 20 be the answer to all my problems? Overall, this is a fine and very comfortable upper, which secures the foot nicely in place. Women's BROOKS GLYCERIN STEALTHFIT 20 :: Sneak up on your competition wearing your updated Women's Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 20 running shoes. Traction is ok and durability should be in line with other Brooks shoes. Even though they run an ounce lighter than their weight on paper, theres definitely some added inertia to this design. (Ride 8.9 - 50%, Fit 9.5 - 30%, Value 8.5 - 15%, Style 8 - 5%). The Glycerin 20 is much easier to live with and run in on a daily basis. But the midsole has sort of a beveled edge and a plastic-y look that makes it look more orthopedic than my personal preference. I missed a few in the early teens, but otherwise Ive logged some solid miles in most models and the Glycerin 16 was my first review for RTR - so every year a new Glycerin lands it feels like my anniversary reviewing shoes. Both are incredible, if you want a little softer ride? The upper holds my foot in place and is very comfortable too. - Beto, DNA Loft V3 midsole, flexibility, and stability make easy runs fun-Sam, GTS support Guide Rails not noticed and likely useful for neutral runners given the soft foam and fairly loose comfort fit regular upper version I have: Sam, DNA Loft v3 bounce is more subtle than the Aurora B;sL- Jeff/Sam, Weight is way up there 10.9 oz US9 in my GTS with regular upper especially given DNA Loft v3 supercritical foam and how light the similar Aurora-BL was. Its looks are polarizing, its upper unconventional, and its bounce undeniable, the Aurora-BL was one of the most unique shoes to come out in some time, and I was and am a big fan of it. My Regular/Regular (standard upper, non-GTS version) showed up in the local Denver Broncos blue and orange colorway, and looked a little understated right out of the box. 7 Comparisons, Brooks Glycerin 20 Multi Tester Reviews: 4 versions with energetic DNA Loft v3 supercritical foam. Every part of the upper strives to provide comfort mile after mile, with a layered mesh surrounding most of the foot. Create a personalized feed and bookmark your favorites. At every point it is a few millimeters wider, but its one of those things where the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts - a few millimeters here and there really adds up. SATISFY Running Apparel Reviews and Interview: Tru adidas Terrex Agravic Pro Review: more carbon plat ON Running Cloudrunner Multi Tester Review. While underfoot is stable up top most support/stability shoes have at least some additional medial upper support via overlays, straps, or denser mesh. Join Outside+ to get Womens Running magazine, access to exclusive content, thousands of training plans, and more. I ran the Glycerin 17 and was surprised at just how much I enjoyed them. I remember loving the Glycerins because they were soft but didnt feel slow, and they flexed in a way that made them feel responsive. The best-looking shoes arent the ones you want on your feet at mile 21 of a marathon the most comfortable ones are. The DNA Loft V3 midsole has just the perfect amount of soft but not a sink in feel. Where Skechers has failed me time after time is in the upper department of their performance oriented shoes. The Glycerin has the great advantages of a modern supercritical foam, being soft while not bottoming out, not too heavy and also quite responsive. At first, this was not my impression. -, Stealthfit fits like a glove and the lockdown is just perfect and secure. There is an absolutely massive helping of the stuff here, making this an ideal high-mileage workhorse that excels at beating back even some of the roughest, toughest asphalt. In the support version, the shoe comes in three different colorways for both men and women. There are a few stand-out changes to this new edition that are greatly appreciated. My regular upper over built and over plush? Plated loud racers are a different animal and purpose and are often noisy. This may very well be an excellent high-mileage trainer for runners that have more upper body muscle than I do, though! What no gusset in such an upper in general and especially in a support oriented shoe? In my opinion, the best Glycerin yet. As Jeff said the shoe uses the same Fresh Foam X its shape changed with the forefoot a bit wider and now I feel less road at each step. Its not either of those shoes, but takes elements of both very cleanly. Ill report back after a couple of more runs if anything changes. My first run was for an easy run and the shoe felt a bit firm but at the end of the run the shoe felt more energetic and the next run the shoe felt amazing, soft and responsive and very well balanced. On a progression run I started slow and felt the soft and bouncy ride but as the pace started to pick up the shoe feels more energetic which make a fun ride and the only other shoe I enjoyed that feeling was the Triumph 19 well balanced and soft and bouncy with that energy return to cruise the miles. Theres not a great amount of grip, but I had no issue during testing, even when running on wet sidewalks. Its a perfect marathon training shoe if youre looking to only buy one running shoe, and its durable enough to get you through most of your training. I still dont think the Glycerin 20 is a huge smile shoe, but I think its a little smile shoe, maybe a big smirk, but its a big smirk you can put virtually all of your easy miles on and not have to worry about the extra wear and tear all the big bounces are putting on your lower legs. Im not a huge fan of knit uppers, and I think that even though this upper feels good on the foot and holds decently, it still contributes to the lack of harmony of the shoe. Then technology such as here DNA Loft v3 is adopted in the traditional lines like the Ghost, Caldera 6 trail (. As Joost, Alex and Jeff said and they are right. If your wallet can take the hit and you want the best 1-2 punch of big cushion trainers ever put together? For me it is hard to choose between these two but the Glycerin 20 caught me by surprise with this new version of the DNA Loft v3 and is definitely a shoe worth the money, and is durable and fun as is the Triumph 19. Did anyone who tested the GTS version also have experience with the Kayano 28s? The Glycerin is the more usable shoe, that gives a little bit of bounce, and none of the achilles pain. Given the flatness of the underfoot geometry, theres a relatively high amount of outsole material in contact with the ground at any given time, further enhancing traction and improving the ride. It is a modern do it all daily trainer whereas the Glycerin is a plush cruiser for slower miles. I found older versions indeed plush all around and quite ponderously soft and dull. Powered by, The Glycerin 20 and in my version the GTS version with the regular upper had me paying attention for one key reason. Literally a foam/midsole/outsole to run forever and a day on: energetic, deep, stable, pleasing, smooth rolling, lighter than weight: Stealthfit weight just under 10 oz / 283g for my M9.5, Stealthfit is an easy on and off shoe and still very secure lockdown. The ride is not fast, that's for sure given the weight and broad platform. I sure was happy that I had the GTS version to stabilize things and for sure regretted even with GTS not receiving true to size as the loose fit impacted the performance. I found it had plenty of volume, the laces were secure, and the heel collar is not too bulky. Ive been putting most of my miles on this shoe to test durability, because the exposed lateral edge is normally where I land, and in Glycerins past that DNA Loft v1 would get torn up pretty quickly. No reak medial reinforcements higher up to go with the effective and even for me as a neutral runner kind of essential here Guide Rails to help support the foot at the critical lace up and rear collar area? The Glycerin ticks the typical knit upper boxes like a denser knit in areas that need to secure the foot, or give support and a more open knit over the forefoot, in order to provide some breathability. Putting them on I started to warm up a bit to the Glycerin 20. I checked reviews of past versions and Brooks own information of this new version to see what I might have been missing all these years. Nothing here.
The step in feel, always a Brooks strength is sublime from underfoot to upper feel. Check out our guide to buying running shoes here). The midfoot feels very secure and the heel counter has no issues and no slippage. Someone who is looking for a reliable training shoe that is affordable, durable, and offers cushion and stability. Thank you, 2017 Road Trail Run. While it stuck with the same Fresh Foam X theyve been using for a few years, the shape and volume of the midsole changed, and with it, the entire ride improved by leaps and bounds. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Ive had a few runs in them and am still waiting for them to open up. There are now four, yes four, versions in the Glycerin family to choose from, depending upon your pronation needs, fit preferences, and weight preferences. I ran 85 miles in this shoe and the outsole is holding pretty well even at my normal wear areas. Theres going to be plenty of detail below, but if you need to know the story has a happy ending before you start, rest easy. I got this years Guide instead of the Ride for review, and while Ive only had a couple of shorter runs in it, I can confirm that the light control elements of the Guide dont really sit well with my stride. The Brooks logo overlays on either side of the Glycerin provide a tiny extra bit of structure to the midfoot. Dont get me wrong its a good shoe, and Im going to keep it in my rotation for those long run miles, but the Glycerin 20 definitely lets you know its meant for the easy days. It is very obviously a different compound than past versions of DNA Loft. - Beto, Stealthfit fits like a glove and the lockdown is just perfect and secure. Theres a big slab of foam here and on first touch it seems less flexible than previous Glycerin models. Sam, Stealthfit upper a bit warm for warm climates (Africa and Mexico) Joost/Beto, In spite of the nice transitions, a bit of a dull ride Joost/Peter, Took me a couple runs to get the midsole to feel smooth (though now that it is, its great) Alex/Sam, Plush upper provides slightly too loose of a fit Ryan/Sam, Over-engineered midsole for lighter runners Ryan, Makes me want to take up a different sport Peter, mens GTS regular upper 10.9 oz / 309g (US9), non-GTS Stealthfit (US9.5) 282g / 9.95 oz. I dont find it to be flexible, bouncy or smooth. Detractions for a loose fit from an overly plush upper, above average weight, and an over-engineered midsole for lighter runners. Its comfortable, but ultimately doesnt help the overall feel of the shoe for me. It is well matched to the midsole and stabilizes the soft DNA Loft v3, has effective deep decoupling groove to help get past that flat on the ground midfoot area and iis very quiet on the road, always a sign of well matched materials and effective geometry in a trainer. Fit is spot on true-to-size for length, although the Regular/Regular is a very high volume shoe. PWRRUN+ is a nice midsole that also last a lot of miles and the outsole has great traction dry or wet with lots of rubber for durability. ASICS Metaspeed Sky+ and Edge+ Marathon Super Shoe Garmin inReach Mini 2 Review: 2 Way Satellite Mess Skechers Performance GO Run Razor Excess 2 Multi T Testbericht: Saucony Peregrine 12 - leichter und k Quick Strides 33: Derek Lis Zurich Marathon Repor Avis et Impressions: Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite-Objet New Balance Fresh Foam X Tempo v 2 Review. The smooth, bright white midsole looks massive out of the box. RELATED: The Best Running Shoes for Women with Flat Feet.
The luxurious feel and the soft ride also make it a great option for those long slow distance runs. glycerin While I appreciate the drama-free and very comfortable plush feeling it delivers, at times it felt a bit loose, especially in the toe box. Ive found the past few iterations of the Glycerin a little meh, but all this has changed with the Glycerin 20. Glycerin. For the regular version, the upper has been tweaked slightly from previous iterations. adrenaline shoegalleryonline While a bit heavier yet, and with a trail outsole, if you need a long slow road and recovery days trainer that of course can trail also please consider it. I sure was happy that I had the GTS version to stabilize things and for sure regretted even with GTS not receiving true to size as the loose fit impacted the performance. Lets see what this all means on the run. With the midsole bulging out around the edges of the outer, Ive noticed a bit of wear on the lateral edges of the DNA Loft already, but there seems to be enough outsole material to prevent this from becoming a real problem. Traction has held up fine, and it seems like it should be durable, though its too soon to tell. 10 Comparisons. While underfoot is stable up top most support/stability shoes have at least some additional medial upper support via overlays, straps, or denser mesh.
