We hope you'll find these hands-on tutorials educational and helpful. It also supports a number of complex build strategies. Compared to the GitHub Actions UI, which feels like it was jammed into the existing GitHub experience, CircleCI's interface feels modern, clean, and easy to follow. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want. Actions and workflows are way more sharable and composable. CircleCI attempted to kick off a build immediately. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need. Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control. CircleCI is my favorite, but their outages are pretty bad.
What people prefer from tools like Gitlab and Github Actions is the capability to attach to other parts of the Devops pipeline. This can be useful when debugging a failed run. I use Travis CI because of various reasons - The doc said that I needed to add some environment variables containing my AWS credentials and account info to my CircleCI project.
check out our tutorial on getting started with Docker, Francesco Ciulla's article on making your Docker container production-ready with ECR and ECS, a tutorial on migrating from GitHub Actions, CircleCI has a detailed tutorial on exactly this subject, turn it into a fully-hosted, scalable, and secure application hosted on AWS, An Elastic Container Repository (ECR) repo to hold your container, An ECS task definition that defines memory, CPU, and other parameters for your container, An ECS service that specifies how many instances of your container to run and how to load-balance traffic. A great resource (and the one I used for this article) is Francesco Ciulla's article on making your Docker container production-ready with ECR and ECS. For our GitHub Actions Docker to ECS deployment, our Actions script expects the variables to be named AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY.
Why Doesnt Your CI Pipeline Have Security Bug Testing? This failed because, per the tutorial doc, I needed to add some environment variables to the project to grant access to my AWS environment. In addition to this, you'll need to tell GitHub how to access your AWS account. Using GitHub Actions means your team doesn't need to learn and manage a separate platform for its CI/CD solution. Using GitHub Actions, you can define a workflow that performs a set of actions, a reusable extension that performs a specific task. And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. * It can provide caching when build sbt, just add this section to yml file However, things get more complicated as scale. 
Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI. It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself.
Using GitHub Actions means your team doesn't need to learn and manage a separate platform for its CI/CD solution. 7. Both tools share a number of strengths. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.
The entire workflow is executed in response to some event - e.g., a check-in to a branch on your repository. With CircleCI, all of those are taken care by CircleCI. My only major complaint was that the CircleCI documentation was a bit disjointed and hard to piece together. All in all, GitHub Actions makes it somewhat easy to build and deploy code from your GitHub repos into AWS. Using CircleCI also means learning (and paying for) yet another tool. Ive used Jenkins heavily in the past, some Drone and GH Actions as well. In the journey toward a modern service-based networking solution, core workflows are needed for discovering services, securing service communications, automating networking tasks, and controlling access. Additionally, Actions are defined and shown on a repo. We hope you'll find these hands-on tutorials educational and helpful. circleci github api data more configurable to setup ci/cd: Overall, I'd say that CircleCI feels more suited to large, complex projects that span a number of repos. This time, I got a clean build, which means that my container was pushed to ECR and ECS and my new container image was successfully running. See which teams inside your own company are using CircleCI or GitHub Actions. I have seen a 3000 line CircleCi file, extremely messy. (If you're unfamiliar with containers, check out our tutorial on getting started with Docker.).
* Easy to use, many documentation, Weakness: All that is great. I would recommend you to consider the JFrog Platform that includes JFrog Pipelines - it will allow you to manage the full artifact life cycle for your sbt, docker and other technologies, and automate all of your CI and CD using cloud native declarative yaml pipelines. Easy setup, easy to understand, fast and reliable, Jobs that mention CircleCI and GitHub Actions as a desired skillset. I scrolled down to Deployment and clicked Deploy to Amazon ECS. Has anyone built a shared private library in GitHub actions on GitHub teams ? (Down side: this file contains my AWS access credentials in plain text, which isnot great.) You can add secrets by navigating to your GitHub account settings and then clicking Secrets -> Actions. But building that out will require time and patience.
workflow. Overall, I'd say that CircleCI feels more suited to large, complex projects that span a number of repos. I use Google Cloud Build because it's my first foray into the CICD world(loving it so far), and I wanted to work with something GCP native to avoid giving permissions to other SaaS tools like CircleCI and Travis CI. And both offer extensibility mechanisms for adding customized build steps. Using the terraform apply command, I was able to create a new ECR repository and ECS Fargate cluster. Already have a CI/CD tool you just love?
As luck would have it, CircleCI has a detailed tutorial on exactly this subject. This was the problem that we created TinyStacks to solve. From there, I clicked New workflow. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project. Not a bummer, but still good, If you dont want to manage your machine, CircleCI > Github/Gitlab, If your workflow runs on mac (for example, building release for ios applications), CircleCI > Github/Gitlab. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container. Unfortunately, I realized that, while this GitHub Action will automate pushing your built container to ECS, it won't perform any other infrastructure automation on your behalf. However, both tools are focused primarily on the build (continuous integration) aspect.
Sign up for an account today and use our documentation to create your first stack! You define actions as steps and group them into jobs. I actually really like that GL calls it a merge request- makes more sense than pull request. Or go with any other CI product that takes care of the machine for you.
We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. 
Learn HashiCorp tools with self-guided tutorials, videos, and hands-on labs. So, for simplicity's sake, I forked this repo into my own account and then clicked Projects on the CircleCI dashboard. Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process.
I scrolled down to Deployment and clicked Deploy to Amazon ECS. Slack Notifications. It also provides a robust extensibility API through which you can define your own custom actions either in a Docker container or via JavaScript. Fortunately, Terraform is easy to use. With CircleCi as far as I know, all workflows need to in 1 yaml file. This failed because, per the tutorial doc, I needed to add some environment variables to the project to grant access to my AWS environment. However, the default deployment actions still assume you have an existing AWS infrastructure with which to work. This may be why a fairly impressive list of open source projects use CircleCI as a build engine. Sign up for an account today and use our documentation to create your first stack! Their examples page contains sample deployment configurations for a number of build strategies, including sequential, parallel, and fan-in/fan-out builds. Both use a fairly straightforward YAML syntax to define build and deployment actions. You have to define six separate environment variables to get your build to work.
Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. But I didn't have a CircleCI project!
Travis CI - Test and Deploy Your Code with Confidence, Senior Software Engineer, Tools & Infrastructure.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. In addition to this, you'll need to tell GitHub how to access your AWS account. You still need to change all of the variables in the GitHub Actions script so that it knows what ECR and ECS resources in your AWS account to target. But wait - you're still not done! If you complete all of this (and configure it correctly), you should be able to see your Action run and push a new image revision to your ECR repo and run it automatically on your ECS cluster. Their examples page contains sample deployment configurations for a number of build strategies, including sequential, parallel, and fan-in/fan-out builds. Instead, they encourage you to install Hashicorp's Terraform and use their ECR/ECS infrastructure sample hosted on GitHub. (If you're unfamiliar with containers, check out our tutorial on getting started with Docker.) kenden GitHub Actions seems like a great choice if you're managing builds and deployment for a handful of repos. CircleCI
But for large-scale teams, you'll probably want the ease of use and cross-project visibility that CircleCI offers. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.
Unfortunately, I realized that, while this GitHub Action will automate pushing your built container to ECS, it won't perform any other infrastructure automation on your behalf. Add repo It would take a while to do the same on CircleCI. Want to see how easy it is for yourself? You still need to change all of the variables in the GitHub Actions script so that it knows what ECR and ECS resources in your AWS account to target. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. You have tons of predefined variables and it is something as easy as this: That's it. I then created a project using this sample repo. However, I noticed that the CircleCI sample repo for this project contained its own small Dockerfile.
In other words, neither tool simplifies the complexity of deploying to the cloud. Except for the reuseable workflow limitation that requires the repository to be public. Gitlab as a source control is almost identical but you have to figure out what a merge request is first :). An ECS service that specifies how many instances of your container to run and how to load-balance traffic In other words, neither tool simplifies the complexity of deploying to the cloud. 2.
Both tools share a number of strengths. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. Utilizing CircleCI's AWS CloudFormation templates, it only took me a few minutes to configure my terraform.tfvars file to give access to my AWS account. CircleCI also uses its own YAML syntax, defined in a config.yml file, to define a build and deployment pipeline. Click - Click - Click
You define actions as steps and group them into jobs. 1. First, it provides a cleaner, more unified interface for creating, monitoring, and managing build and deployment pipelines. I won't go into depth on how to configure these resources. This may be why a fairly impressive list of open source projects use CircleCI as a build engine. It works well for Java / Apache Maven projects and we were able to configure it to use the latest Oracle JDK as per our needs. With so many companies using GitHub, it only makes sense for the service to support its own integrated CI/CD workflow. But wait - you're still not done! CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Unlocking the Cloud Operating Model: Thrive in an era of multi-cloud architecture, Deploy Terraform infrastructure with CircleCI, tutorial guides you through automating the standard, workflow using AWS S3 as a backend. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Using CircleCI also means learning (and paying for) yet another tool. Easy YAML configuration. An Elastic Container Repository (ECR) repo to hold your container This was the problem that we created TinyStacks to solve. However, I noticed that the CircleCI sample repo for this project contained its own small Dockerfile. CircleCI attempted to kick off a build immediately. GitHub's primary advantage is thatwell, it's GitHub. In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. But it was easy enough to find by clicking the ellipsis next to my project in the dashboard, clicking Project Settings, and then selecting Environment Variables. Claim a $50 credit for HCP Vault or HCP Consul, HashiCorp shares have begun trading on the Nasdaq, Discover our latest Webinars and Workshops. As with GitHub, I wanted to see how long it would take me to figure out how to deploy my Docker container onto AWS using CircleCI. You have to define six separate environment variables to get your build to work. You can click on the run of your Action and see the output for each step in your jobs. Let money do the work. Say, if you start from 0 and want to confuigure CI to run tests then publish the app on kubernetes, Gitlab would be much better.
Big limitations if you can't reuse jobs, Press J to jump to the feed. A major plus is the one dashboard for all workflows. The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. Second, CircleCI is built for handling complex build pipelines. Another big plus for GHA over GL is the popularity of GitHub itself. It means that dev/test/prod parity is simple to achieve and maintain. 
CircleCI, as its name implies, is a continuous integration and continuous deployment service that aims to be the one-stop shop for all your deployment needs. Additionally, Actions are defined and shown on a repo. A fully managed platform to automate infrastructure on any cloud with HashiCorp products. If your team has a large number of repos and ongoing builds, the lack of a single dashboard will undoubtedly make everything a nightmare to manage. Continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms like CircleCI and GitHub Actions automate pipelines for new software releases. Automatically deploy a Gatsby site to Firebase Hosting.
To help you get started with CI/CD automation, we have updated our tutorials on automating Terraform. CircleCI differs from GitHub Actions in a few ways. Give us a shout. Even if you don't host your git repository at Gitlab, you can have Gitlab pull changes automatically from wherever you repo lives. I went to my repo, db-test-2, and clicked the Actions tab.
It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD.
To test out GitHub Actions (and CircleCI), I set myself a simple task: upload a new version of a Docker container from a project in one of my GitHub repos to Amazon Web Service's Elastic Container Service. Given the number of actions available and GitHub Actions' infinitely extensible nature, I've no doubt you can build impressive automated workflows with the technology. Most of these are duplicates of the values I already put into the terraform.tfvars file: Decisions about CircleCI and GitHub Actions. Cloud based system so no dedicated server required, and you do not need to administrate it. GitHub Actions seems like a great choice if you're managing builds and deployment for a handful of repos. (GitHub Actions provides native build and test support for Java, .NET, Ruby, Swift, Powershell, Node.js, Python, and Xamarin.)
Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://circleci.com/integrations/kubernetes/. Supports Major Programming Languages. First, it provides a cleaner, more unified interface for creating, monitoring, and managing build and deployment pipelines. What are some alternatives to CircleCI and GitHub Actions? Helpful when you're installing just a few additional dependencies. This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. For example, you could define a continuous integration workflow in GitHub Actions that builds a project and runs a series of tests on it.
It's literally like:
both Gitlab and Github Actions are worlds better that circle, Why GitHub actions? If you need the hardware that are > than the default hardware of Github/Gitlab runners -> CircleCI can tweak that with one line of code. From there, I had to set up a CircleCI project that could push my image to ECR and then update the task definition the Terraform deployment had created in ECS. I went to my repo, db-test-2, and clicked the Actions tab. Instead, they encourage you to install Hashicorp's Terraform and use their ECR/ECS infrastructure sample hosted on GitHub. I checked the AWS Management Console and found that, sure enough, I had an ECR repo, ECS cluster, ECS task definition and service all created with the appropriate prefixes. In particular, we've seen in recent years a proliferation of Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) solutions aimed at making it easier to package and deploy applications in the cloud. Give us a shout. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable.
3.
However, as with GitHub Actions, CircleCI doesn't touch orchestrating cloud resources on your behalf. You can add secrets by navigating to your GitHub account settings and then clicking Secrets -> Actions. Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Just in terms of configuration gha is light-years better IMHO. Orbs just don't measure up in my experience, Actions and workflows are way more sharable.
The thing is; gitlab can do this just as easy. (We're one of them!) If you are considering Jenkins I would recommend at least checking out Buildkite.
In this article, I take a look at how the two services compare by stepping through performing a common CI/CD task in each. You could then define a connected workflow that deploys the resulting product to an artifact repository or directly onto a cloud provider such as AWS. CircleCI sports a much cleaner, modern, unified UI for managing builds across a large number of projects. All that is great. So, for simplicity's sake, I forked this repo into my own account and then clicked Projects on the CircleCI dashboard. I have been using circleci for a while now wondering if i'm missing some features staying with circleci, so wanted to get some input We use cci to run a pipeline to k8s cluster, i can create a new cluster in few lines if needed.. also creating docker images and pushing them to registry is pretty seamless their availability, they have an outage like every week (especially for the cost), their approval process (restricted contexts) is janky at best.
To get this to work, you need to pre-create the following resources in your AWS account: I won't go into depth on how to configure these resources.
This means there's no unified dashboard showing the status for your team's builds across all of your projects. You can automate a whole lot of things with different triggers. (GitHub Actions provides native build and test support for Java, .NET, Ruby, Swift, Powershell, Node.js, Python, and Xamarin.) Gitlab is also great, with a great UI.
CircleCI is a much much more mature product. Since the sample project contains a config.yml, I was able to use that. The amount of events you can trigger your workflow with is a major plus. In particular, we've seen in recent years a proliferation of Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) solutions aimed at making it easier to package and deploy applications in the cloud.
If your team has a large number of repos and ongoing builds, the lack of a single dashboard will undoubtedly make everything a nightmare to manage. 2022 TinyStacks, Inc. All rights reserved. Includes broad IDE support. But I didn't have a CircleCI project! All in all, if you are a small team with a medium/big application to take care of, go CircleCI. Rich pre-made actions.
Their advantage over circle CI is that they are fully fledged DevSecOps platforms. Part of what the terraform.tfvars file asked me to specify was a prefix that the tool adds to resource names. Support of build matrix Setup is straightforward and doesn't require deep knowledge of AWS, Githib Actions, CircleCI, or any other tools. In both cases, you still have to create and manage the tools and templates to create the hosting infrastructure you need in your cloud provider of choice. This means there's no unified dashboard showing the status for your team's builds across all of your projects.
Many teams already use GitHub for their code repository management. The New Workflow page gave me a large list of options. This can be useful when debugging a failed run. Will integrate smoothly with all your other toolset. Both GitHub Actions and CircleCI have the same goal: provide a continuous integration and continuous deployment engine that can work with a large variety of code bases and cloud hosting providers. Very hard to sum up the experience using 3 very complex products in a few lines, GL and GH are both great. The New Workflow page gave me a large list of options. I wonder if they actually meet their SLAs, I havent really checked because we are fairly small and the impact is minimal to us, usually. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp. I then created a project using this sample repo. An ECS task definition that defines memory, CPU, and other parameters for your container To test out GitHub Actions (and CircleCI), I set myself a simple task: upload a new version of a Docker container from a project in one of my GitHub repos to Amazon Web Service's Elastic Container Service. GitHub provides a large number of default actions. GitHub provides a large number of default actions. Here, the docs got a little confusing. The entire workflow is executed in response to some event - e.g., a check-in to a branch on your repository.
1. (Indeed, the CircleCI docs even have a tutorial on migrating from GitHub Actions.) I really like it because it's free for the first 120 minutes, and it's one of the few CICD tools that enterprises are open to using since it's contained within GCP. Here, the docs got a little confusing. As we saw above, you can use both GitHub Actions and CircleCI to deploy your application as well as build it.
For example, you could define a continuous integration workflow in GitHub Actions that builds a project and runs a series of tests on it.